Archive for February 2009

No helmet? That’s contributory negligence… | Bicycle business | News by BikeBiz

New court ruling sets precedent for accident counterclaims

A recent High Court judgement has taken into account whether or not a cyclist was wearing a helmet during a road collision, outlining that the cyclist is guilty of contributory negligence for choosing not to.

Despite helmet use not being compulsory under UK law, the judge overseeing Smith v Finch 2009 ruled the cyclist to be partially liable if wearing a helmet could be proven to have prevented any injuries sustained.

BikeRadar spoke to Richard Brooks from law firm Withy King who said: “this ruling means that if you are injured and a cycle helmet could have reduced your injuries, you may not be able to recover full compensation.”

via No helmet? That’s contributory negligence… | Bicycle business | News by BikeBiz.

Newsletter

Signup for our monthlyish newsletter. Special offers, shop news and generally good stuff. If you are local, tick the local email box for extra special local treats.